Ghana’s reigning Telecel Ghana Music Awards ‘Artist of the Year,’ Stonebwoy, has found himself at the center of a heated debate after requesting that his name be added to an article published by the Grammys about the history of Hiplife in Ghana.
The article, which lists 10 essential artists who played a significant role in the evolution of the Hiplife genre, did not include Stonebwoy, a fact that the Afro Dancehall star has taken an issue with.
READ ALSO: My bodyguard followed me to class for the first 3 weeks at GIMPA – Stonebwoy reveals
The Burniton Music boss has not been shy in voicing his displeasure, criticizing the Grammys for what he perceives as an oversight.
He argued that his contributions to the genre are significant enough to warrant a mention alongside other notable figures such as Prince Bright, BukBak, Okyeame Kwame, and Praye, whose names were also left out of the article.
According to Stonebwoy, the omission of these influential artists is a disservice to the legacy of Ghanaian music and its global impact.
The critique of the “Into The Future” hitmaker has seen a lot of reactions on social media, with fans and industry insiders taking sides.
While some supporters rallied behind Stonebwoy, asserting that he has indeed influenced the Hiplife genre, others were less sympathetic.
Critics argue that Stonebwoy, known primarily for his Afro Dancehall style, should not be included in a discussion focused on Hiplife, which has its roots in blending hip-hop with traditional Ghanaian sounds.
READ ALSO: I plan to have another child by age 50 – Mcbrown reveals
Notably, key industry players have also weighed in on the matter, further dividing opinions. Some believe that Stonebwoy’s request is valid, given his stature and influence in the Ghanaian music industry.
They argue that genres evolve, and Stonebwoy’s fusion of Afro Dancehall with elements of Hiplife warrants recognition.
However, others maintain that the article’s exclusion was appropriate, as Stonebwoy’s primary genre is not Hiplife, and his inclusion would blur the lines of what the article aimed to represent.
See Stonebwoy’s post below
